Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Monday, February 24, 2014 | |||||
85% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
85% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
80% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: Confusion on booster policy | ||||||
85% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments: Room was too warm for first 30 minutes. | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Recycle Awards. Policy JLCDB - use of Epinephrine because it is so obviously needed and so obviously supported by the board. Always the student opening the meeting. Report on Fountas and Pinnel results between 2013 and 2014. Student Anthony Arnette - good speaker. Recycle Program. | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
Inconsistency in exam exemptions from high school to high school. Budget Process - we have policies in place regarding the process. It doesn't seem that we are following them, particuarly DB and DBG |
A Web Site To Help The Rock Hill School Board Keep In Touch With The Community
Monday, February 24, 2014
Rock Hill School Board February Business Meeting Self Evaluation #rhschoolboard
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)