Everyone was considerate of fellow board members and staff
- Answered: 7
- Skipped: 0
YesNo
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
|
100.00%
7
| ||||||||
No
|
0.00%
0
| ||||||||
| Total | 7 | ||||||||
Comments(1)
| |||||||||
This comment goes with #2 since there was no comment box. I did not think the responses to questions on the policies were as well prepared as needed.
8/11/2015 7:06 AM View respondent's answers
| |||||||||
I thought the quality of reports for the board was good
- Answered: 7
- Skipped: 0
YesNo
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
|
100.00%
7
|
No
|
0.00%
0
|
| Total | 7 |
Q3
The Athletic Facility Equity Report was very long. Do you have a recommendation for making this shorter?
- Answered: 7
- Skipped: 0
Tony did a great job shortening up what could of easily had been a 2 hour presentation. So no.
8/11/2015 4:48 PM View respondent's answers
I think it was necessary for gathering information but it might have been presented more reflectively using team members who were. In attendance.
8/11/2015 4:37 PM View respondent's answers
No! All information was needed. Great report.
8/11/2015 2:15 PM View respondent's answers
No
8/11/2015 8:09 AM View respondent's answers
It helped that he skipped the individual interviews with the principals. The thoroughness of his report did make me wish for a similarly comprehensive examination on the equity of our facilities for academic endeavors.
8/11/2015 7:06 AM View respondent's answers
I have no problem with the length of the report. It was extremely well done and provided needed information to the board.
8/10/2015 10:28 PM View respondent's answers
No, in fact I think the presentation was condensed as much as it could be. The paper version was long yes, but VERY well prepared.
8/10/2015 9:49 PM View respondent's answers
Have you ever looked at the Dropbox document for future board discussion
- Answered: 7
- Skipped: 0
YesNo
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
|
100.00%
7
|
No
|
0.00%
0
|
| Total | 7 |
Q5
Do you have any items for future board discussion?
- Answered: 7
- Skipped: 0
update from food services.
8/11/2015 4:48 PM View respondent's answers
I would like to include more positive reports of things
8/11/2015 4:37 PM View respondent's answers
Report from transportation.
8/11/2015 2:15 PM View respondent's answers
No
8/11/2015 8:09 AM View respondent's answers
One of my concerns is that we ask for clarification and don't always get it. I am trying to keep better notes so I might remember to re-ask. From last night the addition of the notice to all parents on the retention policy; also where the costs for upgrades to athletic facilities fits in our 5 year capital plan. Then, we have never discussed the "value add" of Title I, other ancillary programs. I'm not sure we have agreement on the frequency/depth of reports on academic checkpoints through the year or on progress toward implementing PLCs.
8/11/2015 7:06 AM View respondent's answers
Needs more thought on my part
8/10/2015 10:28 PM View respondent's answers
I know it's in the works but the continuance of the choice programs in middle school ( ie what's going to happen to the Spanish Emerson etc.) . I would also like to talk about communication, in specific text message communication ( it's late and I can't remember the technical term) but basically the text message version of "connect-Ed" calls.
8/10/2015 9:49 PM View respondent's answers
