Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Monday, June 10, 2013 | |||||
93% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
93% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
87% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
67% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments:Feedback and squeaks and echos from podium microphone were distracting (Last meeting as well). Who controls this? Women's voices did not cause the problem. | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Always the students and the "path finders". Budget because it is balanced with no tax increase. Master Plan - charrette idea is great for everything. A Good Meeting. Oakdale staff did great! | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
Does purchase of Ebenezer Elementary property need to be voted on at a public business meeting? Board needs to be involved with design of a new district office building - need a discussion of board vision for design priorities. Please number the slides to make it easier to find indentity fo questions. We need a policy required charrettes to be used for all major changes/decisions. |
A Web Site To Help The Rock Hill School Board Keep In Touch With The Community
Monday, June 10, 2013
Rock Hill Schools June Work Session Evaluation #rockhill #rhschoolboard
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment