Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Monday, October 28, 2013 | |||||
65% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: After 3 months of discussion, issues were brought up and dominated by one member. | ||||||
75% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
70% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: While I thought they were adequate, it seems one member did not. | ||||||
80% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments: Didn't notice because so engrossed in presentations | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Cameron Stuart - great student - sharing information about Sullivan Middle School's many activities. Middle School Students Pass Recognition. Student Recognition | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
2013 State School Board Association Delegate Assembly suggestions from the information handbook for discussion at the November Work Session. Staff should check policies to be sure there is not a conflict in language before presenting to board for approval. |
A Web Site To Help The Rock Hill School Board Keep In Touch With The Community
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Rock Hill School Board Self Evaluation for October 28, 2013 Business Meeting #rhschoolboard
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment