Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Tuesday, May 27, 2014 | |||||
94% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
94% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
77% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: Thanks for answering questions in advance when possible. Admin Rule IKA-R | ||||||
88% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Capital Requests. Very Good Explanations for Public. Ariana Walk with her French. Student awards and budget. Recognizing and seeing our students. We need that reminder of their importance tonight. | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
A comparison of student academic growth among students who receive F&R lunches in schools with Title I funds compared to students with comparable economic conditions in schools which do not receive Title I funds. |
A Web Site To Help The Rock Hill School Board Keep In Touch With The Community
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Rock Hill School Board Self Evaluation for the May Business Meeting #rhschoolboard
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Rock Hill School Board May Work Session Self Evaluation #rhschoolboard
Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Monday, May 12, 2014 | |||||
90% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
85% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
55% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: Wish we got slides before meeting. Finance needs to be a port of Athletic/football ticket increase (resolved). Athletic financial reports were not clear. Student Marleigh Page from Lesslie Elementary. Information on reading program (summer). Preliminary budget information and ticket prices. Budget - essential information. | ||||||
80% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Managed property report - very informative. Marleigh Page. Master Plan | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
Success/Not of iPad. Need a multi-year financial plan on how we can recover from proposed school funding changes by the state of SC. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)