Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
Date: | Tuesday, May 27, 2014 | |||||
94% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
94% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
77% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
Comments: Thanks for answering questions in advance when possible. Admin Rule IKA-R | ||||||
88% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
Comments: None | ||||||
My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
Capital Requests. Very Good Explanations for Public. Ariana Walk with her French. Student awards and budget. Recognizing and seeing our students. We need that reminder of their importance tonight. | ||||||
My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
A comparison of student academic growth among students who receive F&R lunches in schools with Title I funds compared to students with comparable economic conditions in schools which do not receive Title I funds. |
A Web Site To Help The Rock Hill School Board Keep In Touch With The Community
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Rock Hill School Board Self Evaluation for the May Business Meeting #rhschoolboard
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment