|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTIONS: By
evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future
meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good"
or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check
"Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
Monday, October 28, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% |
Our discussion was
cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). |
|
|
Comments: After 3
months of discussion, issues were brought up and dominated by one member. |
|
75% |
Participation was
encouraged |
|
|
Comments: None |
|
70% |
Reports were clear,
well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. |
|
|
Comments: While I
thought they were adequate, it seems one member did not. |
|
80% |
Our meeting room was
comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. |
|
|
Comments: Didn't
notice because so engrossed in presentations |
|
My favorite discussion
was…….. Because….. |
|
Cameron Stuart - great
student - sharing information about Sullivan Middle School's many activities.
Middle School Students Pass Recognition. Student Recognition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My suggestions for future board meetings are... |
|
2013 State School
Board Association Delegate Assembly suggestions from the information handbook
for discussion at the November Work Session.
Staff should check policies to be sure there is not a conflict in
language before presenting to board for approval. |
