|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTIONS: By
evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future
meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good"
or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check
"Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
Monday, March 10, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% |
Our discussion was
cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). |
|
|
Comments: Jim should have acted sooner when board
members started speaking to other members. |
|
95% |
Participation was
encouraged |
|
|
Comments: None |
|
80% |
Reports were clear,
well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. |
|
|
Comments: Some were a little rambling, but mostly good. Some papers
were handed out at the meeting. Please send digital copy for record keeping. |
|
80% |
Our meeting room was
comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. |
|
|
Comments: None |
|
My favorite discussion
was…….. Because….. |
|
The two girls from
York Road Elementary School. Discussion about retirees was uncomfortable but
a good thing to address. High School dropout prevention. Summer reading
progress. Textbook and options. Ereader. The two young ladies starting the
meeting. The ladies opening our meeting. Discussion around teacher retirement
and minimum wage (curious about that). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My suggestions for future board meetings are... |
|
Inconsistency in exam
exemptions from high school to high school. This is by school, not by teacher
(some allow, some don't). Report on buses and 2005 refunding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
